لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

Due to recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been probable under the previous version in the regulation.

Being a society, it truly is essential to carry on striving for the just legal system that makes certain fairness, protection, and regard for all individuals’ right to life.

Section 302 with the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to work as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application in the death penalty or life imprisonment depends on the specifics of each case, together with any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.

The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive bit of legislation that defines numerous criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for people found guilty.

This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is properly-settled that although looking at the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should take into account the benefit of each of the suitable candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to such qualified candidates who are found being most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed with the respondent department just to extend favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part of the respondent department.

The Court considered the case to generally be maintainable under Article 184 (three) Because the danger and encroachment alleged were for example to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more

This case continues to be cited in a lot of subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional law, judicial independence, as well as the rule of law.

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, would be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It will involve the execution from the convicted person as being a consequence of their crime.

ten. Without touching the merits in the case of your issue of annual increases within the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, this kind of annual increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, involves further assessment to be made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more

13309-B of 2010 to generally be weak types of evidence plus the evidentiary value whereof would be noticed with the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Therefore, confirmed custody from the petitioner in jail is not going to provide any effective purpose at this stage.”

Even though the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows for that possibility of reconsideration or commutation with rylands v fletcher case law the sentence in certain circumstances.